Quote Originally Posted by sup-rbeast View Post
OK...we'll start over. I'll go out. When I come back in I'll check my brain at the door and we'll start out even.
Just embarrassing yourself even more those gems, you say that, but then fail to bring anything to the table when your BS is called out by the same person...if I'm that far off, what the hell are you? lmao Keep it coming though, good stuff.

Quote Originally Posted by R0cketer View Post
Shhhhhh don't tell anybody that they mentioned doing something to 'one' school that wasn't as old as the ones anybody has been talking about or they might think you're against it
Exactly, that logic escapes so many it amazes me. We're talking upkeep/costs of SIX schools on a budget, when enrollment is horrible. NES was never in bad shape at all as I can remember, never seemed old, they just added on to it with the middle school and upgraded the classrooms(so no real huge project that would effect other classrooms)- not too mention this is a elementary school, the circular and technology demands aren't really there as compared to a HS.

Quote Originally Posted by Counts View Post
Wow you mean that they can do all that in the 6 weeks or so the schools will be closed in the summer?
Yet again, another huge flaw in their argument. Remodeling, if it were even feasible or logical, would take a massive amount of time and where are the kids going to go or how long would they have to put up with construction in the school during class session? Not a problem with new schools, hell I don't even know why this is even a debate...new schools or dressed up old schools for around the same price? Better educational opportunities and millions saved or same problems and costs piling up? Hmmmm.